Nitrates, Digoxin and Calcium Channel Blockers
Dr. Paul Forrest
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Nitrates
In anaesthesia, our main therapeutic use of nitrates is in the
perioperative management of myocardial ischaemia or congestive cardiac
failure. Hence most of this
section will pertain to the use of intravenous nitrates- of which the only example in clinical use is
nitroglycerine.
Nitroglygerine was used in the management of angina as ealy as
1879. Since then, it has become on
of the most widely used anti-ischaemic agents, but it has also found a role in the treatment of a variety
of other conditions where smooth muscle relaxation is sought (Table 1).
Table
1. Indications for nitrate therapy
________________________________________________
Ischaemic
heart disease
Stable angina pectoris
Unstable
angina pectoris
Acute
myocardial infarction
Postmyocardial
infarction
Vasospastic
angina
Congestive
heart failure
Acute heart failure with pulmonary oedema
Chronic
heart failure
Miscellaneous
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty
Perioperative
blood pressure control
Treatment of oesophageal spasm
Treatment
of retinal artery occlusion
Treatment
of uterine hypertonus
Treatment
of biliary spasm
Treatment
of pulmonary hypertensive syndromes
MECHANISM OF ACTION
The nitrates are members of a group of drugs known as
nitrovasodilators. Their mechanism
of action at the tissue level has only recently been elucidated. The nitrates are prodrugs which
penetrate the vascular endothelium and are reduced to nitric oxide (NO),
nitrosothiols and s-nitrosocysteine. NO is the most important of these
compounds and it is formed from the amino acid L-arginine. The mechanism by which nitroglycerine
is denitrogenated to NO is unclear.
NO exerts its vascular effects by activating the enzyme guanylate
cyclase, which converts guanosine
triphosphate (GTP) to cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). cGMP in turn produces phosphorylation
of protein kinase, which decreases cytosolic calcium and produces smooth muscle
relaxation.
CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS
Nitroglycerine has numerous vascular effects that decrease myocardial
ischaemia (table 2), although it is thought that those mechanisms that alter
the balance between myocardial oxygen demand and supply are the most
important. Nitroglcerine dilates
veins more than arteries, in contrast to nitroprusside. Venodilatation occurs mainly in the
limbs, splanchnic and mesenteric circulations. This results in a reduction in cardiac preload, afterload, venticular wall tension and myocardial oxygen demand.
Table
2. Anti-ischaemic actions of
nitroglycerine.
decreased
preload, afterload, myocardial oxygen consumption
increased
ventricular fibrillation threshold
decreased
size, extension and complications of myocardial infarction
decreased
platelet aggregation
enhancement
of thrombolytic therapy
dilation
of stenotic coronary arteries
The nitrates can also improve myocardial oxygen supply. Nitroglycerine can dilate stenotic,
atherosclerotic coronary arteries.
Nitroglycerine acts on the coronary circulation primarily by dilating
large conductive vessels, with
only weak and transient effects on the small resistance vessels. Hence while nitroglycerine decreases
coronary perfusion pressure, it
both augments myocarial blood flow and redistributes it more favourably to
increase the endo-epicardial blood flow.
Nitroprusside by comparison may decrease the collateral flow to areas of
ischaemia by causing a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure or by dilating
coronary resistance vessels to produce Ôcoronary steal,Õ which may worsen
myocardial ischaemia (Table 3).
Table 3. Comparison
of nitroglycerine(GTN) and nitroprusside(SNP).
SNP GTN
Preload - - -
Afterload - - -
MVO2 - -
Ischaemic
ECG changes + -
Stenotic
gradient 0 +
Toxicity Cyanide Methaemoglobin
Internal
mammary flow + +
Saphenous
vein flow + -
Respiratory
effects ++
+
ANTIPLATELET AND ANTITHROMBOTIC EFFECTS
Nitroglycerine will produce prolongation of the bleeding time in a
dose-dependent manner. Initially
this was thought to occur only with supraclinical doses, although there is now
evidence that that nitroglycerine may alter platelet function at clinically
relevant doses.
The mechanism of action and metabolism of nitrates in platelets is
similar to that in vascular smooth muscle, it too is mediated by NO, which
activates guanylate cycalse. The
resultant increase in intracellular cGMP produces a decrease in platelet
function.
Despite the experimental evidence, the clinical relevance of the
antiplatelet and antithrombotic effects of nitroglycerine has not been
determined.
Clinical Pharmacology
A major advantage of the organic nitrates is their pharmacologic
versatility, enabling a wide variety of dosing systems and formulations. The nitrates that are in clinical use
today are nitroglycerine, isosorbide dinitrate and recently, 5-isosorbide
mononitrate.
NITROGLYCERINE
Nitroglycerine is highly extracted from blood by the liver. It has a very short half-life of
2.8minutes and it is widely distributed, with a volume of distribution of aboul
3L/kg. Nitroglycerine is volatile
and relatively unstable, tablets
lose their effectiveness oner 4-6 months.
The usual routes of administration are sublingual, intravenous or
topical. Intravenous infusion
solution should be made up immediately prior to use in a glass bottle as it
readily migrates into plastic. The
usual infusion concentration is 100µg/ml,
the infusion rate is titrated to effect but is usually in the range of
0.5-1.5µg/kg/min.
Topical nitroglycerine is prepared as an ointment or as a patch. Nitroglycerine patches produce
sustained plasma concentrations although this may encourage the development of
tolerance.
ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE
Isosorbide dinitrate differs from nitroglycerine by its longer terminal
elimation half-life (20 minutes iv., 64 minutes sublingually). It also has a high first-pass
metabolism, it is broken down to 5-isosorbide- mononitrate and 2-isosorbide
-mononitrate which are both more active than their parent compound. The longer half-life of isosorbide
dinitrate and its metabolites may increase the likelihood of tolerance
developing.
Side Effects
Side effects from the nitrates are few, regardless of the route of
administration. The most common
adverse effects are hypotension (especially orthostatic) and headache. Nausea and occasionally bradycardia
have been reported with nitroglycerine. Nitroglycerine may also aggravate
hypoxia by inhibiting hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and worsening V/Q
mismatch. High doses of
nitroglycerine may produce methaemoglobinaemia. Topical nitrates may produce skin reactions.
Clinical Uses of Nitrates
1. Acute myocardial infarction
Early
nitroglycerine therapy following acute myocardial infarction has been shown to
decrease infarct size, improve
ventricular function and reduce the incidence of complications, including both early and late
mortality. Intravenous therapy is
recommended for 48 hours if possible.
2. Chronic
therapy after myocardial infarction.
Healing of
myocardial infarction takes 3-6 months.
During this time, the infarct area undergoes expansion, with stretching,
thinning and dilatation. Nitrate
therapy during this period produces improved left ventricular function, less
ventricular dilatation and a reduced frequency of aneurysm formation.
3. Unstable
angine. Nitroglycerine is a clinically effective
therapy for unstable angina.
Nitroglycerine has not been shown to be more effective than isosorbide
dinitrate paste in the treatment of unstable angina, although it is the preferred agent because of its rapid
onset and titratability.
4. Stable
angina pectoris. Nitrates are effective in the management of
stable angina, however, there remains uncertainty as to their ideal
utilisation. Nitrates are as
effective as §-blockers or calcium channel blockers as monotherapy for chronic
angina.
Oral
nitrates may be more effective than transdermal, furthermore continuous use
should be avoided to prevent the development of tolerance-hence a
Ônitrate-freeÕ interval of at least 8 hours/day may be necessary.
The
use of a nitrate-free interval has been associated with rebound ischaemia and a
decrease in exercise tolerance, these are inconsistent findings however and
their clinical relevance is unclear.
5. Perioperative
use of nitroglycerine. There is little evidence to support the use
of prophylactic nitroglycerine to reduce ischaemia in patients with coronary
artery disease undergoing cardiac or non cardiac surgery. During cardiac surgery, nitroglycerine
has been shown to be ineffective as prophylaxis but effective as therapy for
internal mammary artery spasm.
6. Congestive
heart failure. With its multiple beneficial haemodynamic
effects, there is little doubt about the efficacy of nitroglycerine in acute
CHF. It is assumed to be of value
in chronic CHF but this has not been unequivocably proven.
Some
recent work suggests that the concomitant use of oral hydrallazine will prevent
the early development of nitrate tolerance in patients with CHF.
7. Miscellaneous
uses. Nitroglycerine is an effective agent in the treatment
of uterine hypertonus. It has also
been used to manage perioperative hypertension and to induce hypotension. Nitroglycerine is also a first-line
drug in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension associated with ischaemia and
ventricular dysfunction.
Digoxin
Pharmacology
Digoxin is the most widely used member of the digitalis
glycosides. The digitalis
glycosides have been used for over two centuries, the principal clinical uses
currently are in the treatment of congestive heart failure and in the treatment
of atrial arrhythmias. Digoxin is
a positive inotrope and enhances automaticity while slowing impulse propagation
in conductive tissue.
MECHANISM OF ACTION
Digoxin exerts its positive inotropic effect independently of the
sympathetic nervous system although in common with it, both ultimately act to raise the level
of intracellular calcium. Digoxin
brings this about by first binding to the a-subunit of sodium-potassium ATPase (which is
increased in CHF). ATPase
generates the energy for the extrusion of sodium fron the cell during phase 4
of the membrane potential..
Therefore inhibition of ATPase results in an influx of sodium and an
efflux of potassium from the cell.
This increases phase 4 depolarisation and causes the resting membrane
potential to become less negative.
The rise in intracellular sodium also produces an increase in
intracellular calcium through Na+-Ca++exchange, which results in increased
contractility. Increased
intracellular calcium is associated with decreased intracellular pH, which
increases inward sodium movement and outward H+ movement, further increasing intracellular sodium and
inotropy.
CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS
Digoxin will augment myocardial contractility in both the failing and
the non-failing heart without raising cardiac output (as heart rate
decreases). Preload is reduced
which in turn, decreases MVO2 and
angina. In normal patients,
digoxin increases systolic BP, pulse pressure and SVR by a direct constrictor
effect on arterial and venous smooth muscle. However in patients with CHF, digoxin decreases SVR and
venomotor tone.
The major action of digoxin on the conducting system is to prolong AV
nodal refractoriness and to thereby reduce the ventricular response to
supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.
The effect of digoxin on the SA node and atria are unpredictable, while
ventricular excitability is usually enhanced. The net result is increased vagal activity, delayed AV
conduction and bradycardia.
Arrhythmic effects from digoxin arise from an extension of the same
effects that increase contractility; an overload of intracellular calcium
results in afterdepolarisation by activation of calcium-sensitive channels,
these arrhythmic effects are exacerbated by the loss of myocardial potassium
that occurs.
Digoxin also appears to normalise the baroreceptor and other
neuroendocrine responses to CHF.
Plasma renin activity is reduced,
ANP is increased (which may account for the initial diuretic effect seen
after digitalisation) and noradrenaline levels and sympathetic tone are
reduced.
Although digoxin is a weak inotrope, it remains an important drug in
the management of chronic CHF, particularly in combination with ACE inhibitors
and vasodilators and when atrial fibrillation coexists with CHF.
Pharmacokinetics
The onset of action of digoxin occurs 15-30 minutes after iv.
administration and peaks in 1.5-5 hours.
The oral bioavailability of digoxin tablets is less than 85%, although
the bioavailablity of the gelatin capsule preparation is 90-95%, which may
necessitate a reduction in dose from the tablets. Intramuscular use is unrelaible and painful. The volume of distribution is large, at
5-8Lkg. It is extensively bound to
heart muscle. Digoxin is
eliminated primarily by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, although
some hepatic metabolism occurs.
The elimination half life is 36 hours. About 30% is excreted unchanged in the urine.
The therapeutic level of digoxin is 0.5-2.0ng/mL, with toxicity
occurring at levels of 2.5ng/mL or greater. Digoxin doses should be reduced in renal failure.
Indications
The indications for digoxin therapy are summarised in table 4.
i) CHF. Digoxin has been a mainstay in the
treatment of CHF due to its inotropic effects and the reduction of MVO2 that occurs. Digoxin is usually introduced after diuretics and ACE
inhibitors. It has been shown to improve symptoms and morbidity, although not survival in patients in
sinus rhythm. Digoxin does appear to be of greatest benefit with more severe
left ventricular dysfunction.
Withdrawing digoxin in patients who are clinically stable on diuretics
and ACE inhibitors has been shown to produce clinical deterioration.
ii) ATRIAL
ARRHYTHMIAS. Digoxin may be used
to slow the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation or flutter. However, it is no more effective than
placebo in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. In the emergency management of atrial
fibrillation, diltiazem or esmolol are preferred to digoxin because of their
much more rapid action.
Table
4. Guidelines for digoxin therapy
Digoxin
Beneficial
Patients with moderate or severe systolic
left ventricular dysfunction alone or in combination with ACE inhibitors.
Patients
with acute myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation
Patients
with congestive heart failure associated with atrial fibrillation
Digoxin
Indication Unclear
Patients
with normal ventricular haemodynamics during diuretic, ACE inhibitor or
vasodilator therapy
Patients
with primarily diastolic ventricular dysfunction
Patients
with decreased left ventricular ejection fractions after myocardial infarction
Digoxin
Probably Not Indicated
Patients with acute myocardial infarction
with sinus rhythm and mild heart failure
Patients
with isolated right ventricular failure
Dosage and Administration
Loading doses of digoxin are often used because its slow elimination,
otherwise steady-state concentrations may take a week to achieve. For rapid digitalisation of a patient
with CHF, a total oral dose of 10-15µg/kg is given in three divided doses every
4 hours. More frequent loading may
produce toxicity. Maintenance
doses 0.125-0.5mg/day., depending on clinical response (heart rate reduction),
plasma levels and the occurrence of side effects. Alternatively, the patient can be more slowly digitalised
with 0.125-0.5mg/day given over 7 days.
Intravenous loading can be achieved by giving 0.5-0.75mg. followed in
1hour (but preferably 2-3 hours) by further 0.125-0.25mg increments up to 2mg
total. The effect is maximal
within 1-3 hours and digitalisation is complete within 12 hours. Maintenance doses are needed in 12-24
hours .
Precautions and Contraindications
The eldely are more sensitive to digoxin and may require lower
doses. Dosing is on the basis of
lean body mass. Digoxin is
relatively contraindicated in the presence of hypoxia, sinus node dysfunction,
hypokalaemia, hypercalcaemia and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Digoxin should be avoided in patients with Wolff-Parkinson -White syndrome
and wide-complex supraventricular arrhythmias (particularly atrial
fibrillation) as acceleration of the ventricular response can occur due to
shortening of the refractory period of the accesory pathway. Ventricular fibrillation has been
reported.
Digoxin should be used with caution in the presence of renal
dysfunction. An anephric patient
should receive standard doses of digoxin, but less frequently (eg. 0.25mg every
3-4 days). This also applies to
patients on dialysis as digoxin is not appreciably dialysed.
Digoxin has been independently associated with an increased mortality
rate in the first year after acute myocardial infarction and it probably should
not be used in these patients.
In an experimental animal model,
digoxin use has been shown to worsen myocardial injury resulting from
ischaemia induced from cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping. This was hypothesised to be due to
digoxin producing higher levels of intracellular calcium, which aggravates ischaemic injury. The clinical relevance of this finding
is unknown.
In a small pilot study of asthmatic patients, digoxin was shown to reduce FEV1 and increase bronchial
hyperresponsiveness. This is
consistent with the observation that an increased salt intake is associated with
worsening asthma. Further studies
are needed.
DRUG INTERACTIONS
Quinidine, amiodorone and verapamil will all increase serum digoxin
concentrations. Arrhythmias have
been reported in digitalised patients receiving suxamethonium, possibly due to
a direct effect or due to hyperkalaemia.
Digoxin toxicity may be exacerbated by thyroid hormone, calcium or
catecholamines, reserpine, propanolol and diuretics..
Toxicity
Digoxin toxicity can occur in any patient although the elderly and
those with hypothyroidism are particularly prone, along with abnormalites such
as hypoxia, hypomagnesaemia, hypercalcaemia, hypokalaemia and in conjunction
with the drugs previously listed.
The cardiac symptoms arise from enhanced automaticity and AV
block. This results in arrhythmias
such as nonparoxysmal junctional tachycardia, ventricular bigeminy and
trigeminy and PVCs, either alone or with VT. Digoxin toxicity very rarely results in atrial fibrillation,
atrial flutter or wide-complex VT.
Extracardiac symptoms include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea,
abdominal pain, confusion, paraesthesias and convulsions. Visual changes occur
less commonly.
MANAGEMENT
Potassium should be given if the level is low, it decreases the binding of digoxin to
the heart and it directlty antagonises some of the cardiotoxic effects of
digoxin. However, if the potassium
level is already high, further
potassium administration may produce complete AV block or cardiac arrest. For the same reasons, potassium is also contraindicated if
high degrees of A-V block are already present.
Serious clinical manifestations may be treated with digoxin-immune Fab
fragments which will reverse the toxicity by binding digoxin.
For serious arrhythmias, lignocaine, procainamide, phenytoin,
propanolol or DC cardioversion may be necessary. Cardioversion may be necessary for drug-resistant VT; if
used for atrial arrhythmias low energy levels should be used along with
lignocaine to suppress PVCs. DC
countershock may precipitate ventricular arrhythmias which may be fatal.
Calcium Channel Blockers
Calcium channel blockers have become established agents in the
treatment of hypertension, coronary artery disease and cardiac
arrhythmias. They exhibit varying
pharmacologic profiles which depend largely on their differing
specificities for intinsic vascular or myocardial effects.
Pharmacology
Nine calcium channel blockers are marketed in the US for the treatment of hypertension, angina, supraventricular arrhythmias and one (nimodipine) for the short-term management of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Only diltiazem, verapamil, nicardipine and verapamil are available iv.
MECHANISM OF ACTION
Calcium antagonists block calcium entry into smooth muscle cells and
myocardial cells. Calcium entry
into the cell induces liberation of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum,
which produces muscle contraction.
Entry of calcium into the cell is possible by either voltage-operated or
by receptor-operated channels.
There are several types of voltage-dependent channels, including T (transient),
L (long-lasting), N (neuronal) and P (purkinje) channels. The T channel is activated at low
voltages (-50mV) in cardiac tissue, plays a major role in cardiac
depolarisation (phase 0) and is not blocked by calcium antagonists. The L-channels are the classic ÒslowÓ
channels, are activated at higher voltages (-30mV) and are responsible for
phase 2 of the action potential.
The calcium antagonists inhibit activation of voltage-operated channels by
binding stereoscopically to the a1c
subunit of the L channel. Different classes of calcium-channel blockers act at
different parts of this subunit. Blockade results in inhibition of calcium
entry into the cell and inhibition of the excitation-contraction coupling. N- channels are also resistant to
blockade by calcium antagonists.
L-channels are found in vascular smooth muscle (arteriolar and venous),
nonvascular smooth muscle (bronchial, GIT) and noncontractile tissues
(pancreas, pituitary, white cells, plateletsÉ)
Table
5 Specificity of calcium antagonists for L-channels
High
specificity
Verapamil
Diltiazem
Dihydropyridines Nifedipine
Nicardipine
Nimodipine
Nitrendipine
Isradipine
Low
specificity
Bepridil
Perhexilene
Flunarizine
The calcium antagonists in clinical use are comprised of drugs from
three different classes: Class I
are the dihydropyridine derivates (Table5), Class II are the phenylalkylamines
(verapamil) and Class III the benzothiazepines (diltiazem).
|
Different calcium antagonists have differing selectivities for calcium
channels (Table 5). High specificity
means than the drug selectively blocks calcium channels, low specificity means that the drug
will also block fast sodium channels.
In turn, there are
differences between the drugs in their specificities for vascular or myocardial
calcium channels. The
dihydropyridines are more specific than diltiazem or verapamil as calcium
channel blockers in vascular smooth muscle, by contrast the latter two produce more marked depression of
calcium entry into myocardial cells.
There are also small differences in the mechanisms of action between
verapamil, diltiazem and the dihydropyridines.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic properties of all of the calcium antagonists are
similar (Table 6). Their
elimination half-lives range from 1.5-6.0 hours. Protein binding is usually greater than 80% (albumen and a1-acid glycoprotein), their metabolism is
mainly hepatic (cytochrome P-450) with a large first-pass effect. Major metabolites are eliminated by the
kidneys.
Table 6 Pharmacokinetics of Three Calcium
Antagonists
Verapamil Nifedipine Diltiazem
Absorption >79% >90% >90%
Biavailability 10-20% 45-62% 24-90%
Onset
of action (oral) 1-2h
15min
15min
1/2-1min
(iv) 2-3min
(sl) 2-3min
(iv)
Peak
action (oral) 3-4h
1-2h 30min
2-5min
(iv) 20min
(sl)
Elimination half-life 3-7h 4h 4h
Protein binding 90% 90% 80%
Metabolism liver liver liver
first
pass 85% 20-30% 50%
Metabolites activity 20-25%
(norverapamil) none 50%(deacetyldiltiazem)
Excretion (%)
gastrointestinal 25 15 60
renal 75 85 40
Dose iv:
0.075-0.15mg/kg sl:
10-40mg tid iv:
0.15-0.25mg/kg
oral: 80-120mg tid or qid oral: 10-40mg tid or qid oral:
30-90mg tid or qid
Therapeutic plasma conc. 80-100ng/l 25-100ng/l 40-200ng/l
Interaction with digoxin Yes No No
Pharmacodynamic effects.
The calcium antagonists are all arteriodilators to varying degrees with
no effect on capacitance vessels.
Hence they will all produce a dose-dependent reduction in afterload, SVR
and arterial blood pressure.
However, there are marked differences between the agents in their
effects on myocardial function (Table 7).
Table
7. Organ selectivity of calcium
antagonists.
Verapamil Diltiazem
Nifedipine Nicardipine Nimodipine Isradipine
vasodilation ++ + +++ +++ ++++ ++++
inotropy - - -
0- 0- 0- 0-
heart
rate - - - - - - +
+ ++ ++
A-V
conduction - - - - - - 0
0
0 0
Nifedipine is a potent arteriodilator with minimal venodilating
effects. Verapamil is less potent
as an arteriodilator than the dihydropyridines more potent as a negative
inotrope. The actions of diltiazem
lie between those of verapamil and nifedipine, it produces less vasodialation
and negative inotropy than verapamil.
All of the calcium antagonists produce inhibition of atrial cells,
depressing sinus activity and A-V conduction and increasing the effective and
functional refractory period of A-V nodal tissue. However, only verapamil and diltiazem produce a decrease in
heart rate, this is because the pronounced vasodilation produced by the
dihydropyridines results in reflex stimulation of adrenergic activity. Similarly, all of the calcium
antagonists are negative inotropes in vivo, however, this effect is masked in the dihydropyridines due
to their more pronounced effects on afterload and reflex sympathetic
stimulation.
The calcium channel blockers produce coronary artery dilation and
increase coronary blood flow.
Nimodipine, nifedipine and nicardipine are the most potent coronary
vasodilators, especially of the epicardial vessels which are prone to
vasospasm. Diltiazam has been
shown to be effective in blocking coronary vasospasm and in animals, all of the
calcium blockers have been shown to dilate coronary arterial stenoses and
improve collateral blood flow.
Both nicardipine and nimodipine are lipid soluble and can cross the
blood-brain barrier. Hence they
can produce cerebral vasodilation and will increase cerebral blood flow.
The calcium channel blockers are all vasodilators of the pulmonary vascular bed.
In common with §-blockers and nitrates, calcium antagonists also
inhibit platelet aggregation. This
is due to the fact that calcium is a mediator involved in the release of
platelet aggregatory factors such as ADP.
Inhibition of platelet aggregation may be an important effect of the
anti-ischaemic drugs, particularly in the treatment of chronic disease.
Calcium Antagonists and Anaesthesia
ANAESTHETIC AGENTS
As the calcium channel blockers produce similar cardiovascular effects to
the halogenated anaesthetic agents, they can have both additive and
potentiating effects. Because of
their greater negative inotropic effects,
verapamil and diltiazem most markedly potentiate the myocardial
depression produced by enflurane, followed by halothane and then
isoflurane. They may also produce
dramatic additive effects on the inhibition of A-V conduction. By contrast, the dihydropyridines have a mainly additive effect with the
volatile agents in reducing SVR,
although above 1.5-2 MAC potentiation occurs because this level of MAC
will produce attenuation of baroreflex responses. In addition, the dihydropyridines produce no significant
alteration of A-V or intraventricular conduction when administerd with volatile
anaesthetics.
The interaction between the calcium antagonists and the volatile agents
is not purely pharmacodynamic, the volatile agents have been shown to inhibit
their metabolism and to decrease hepatic blood flow, this may result in higher
plasma levels and increased pharmacologic effect.
Patients who are taking calcium anatagonists preoperatively and who
have good ventricular function will tolerate clinical concentrations of
volatile agents. However, the
volatile agents may be less well tolerated in the presence of poor ventricular
function or hypovolaemia and they should be used with caution as hypotension,
bradycardia or heart block may occur.
Many patients take both calcium antagonists and §-blockers chronically,
this combination does not adversely affect perioperative cardiac cardiac
conduction although these patients have a decreased heart rate and an increased
P-R interval. Intravenous
verapamil (150µg/kg over 10min.) used to treat intraoperative SVT or coronary
artery spasm in patients on chronic §-blockers will produce only a small
reduction in blood pressure in patients with normal ventricular function. However, in patients with poor
ventricular function this combination may produce a significant reduction in
cardiac output.
During opioid anaesthesia, calcium blockers produce minor additive
effects only, even in the presence of §-blockade.
OTHER EFFECTS
In dogs, verapamil has been shown to decrease the MAC of
halothane. There is also
laboratory and limited clinical data that verapamil also potentiates the effects
of both depolarising and nondepolarising muscle relaxants. In addition, verapamil may interact
with some local anaesthetics through its minor effects on fast sodium channels. The clinical relevance of these
interactions is unclear.
Clinical Indications for the Calcium Antagonists
HYPERTENSION
Hypertension occurring in surgical patients is related mainly to an
increase in SVR, hence vasodilator therapy is the mainstay of its
treatment. Acute intraoperative
hypertension occurs most commonly
in patients undergoing cardiac or vascular surgery, and it is defined as a MAP
above 110mmHg. The rapid control
of intraoperative hypertension is essential to avoid the adverse sequelae of
myocardial ischaemia, depressed LV function and increased surgical blood loss.
Nitroprusside has been the trditional drug of choice in the management
of acute intraoperative hypertension,
however the dihydropyridines are also very effective and safe agents in
this setting. Intravenous
nifedipine, nicardipine and isradipine have been shown to be as effective as
nitroprusside in the management of perioperative hypertension in a variety of
clinical trials. Their use may be
associated with a slight increase in heart rate.
The ideal dosing regimen remains controversial, although a slow bolus
or short infusion would seem to be appropriate as most perioperative
hypertensive episodes are transient.
Dosage regimens are summarised in Table 8, it is important to titrate
from lower doses initially to prevent hypotension occurring.
Table
48 Intravenous dosage of dihydropyrines for
the treatment of hypertension.
Initial
dose (1-5min)mg Continuous
infusion (µg/kg/min)
Nicardipine 0.5-2
(bolus 0.5-1.) 0.25-1
Nifedipine 0.2-1
(bolus 0.2-5) 0.3-1
Israpidine 0.1-0.5
(bolus 0.1) 0.07-0.3
Nifedipine can also be given orally in the awake patient or
sublingually in an awake or anaesthetised patient to treat perioperative
hypertension. A dose of 10-20mg is
usually effective within 15-30 minutes.
Many patients presenting for surgery are on calcium antagonists for the
control of essential hypertension.
Approved drugs for this indication include amlodipine, nicardipine,
nifedipine, nisoldipine, diltiazem and verapamil. The use of calcium channel
blockers as antihypertensives may be associated with regression of established
left ventricular hypertrophy. However, as there is a lack of evidence that
their use reduces hypertension-related morbidity and mortality they are not
recommended as first-line agents unless there are reasons to avoid the use of
thiazides or §-blockers. Verapamil
is the most widely used calcium antagonist for the chronic management of
hypertension, it reduces SVR while
its effects on the sinoatrial node prevents a reflex increase in heart
rate. In addition, verapamil has a
mild natiuretic effect so compensatory sodium retention does not occur, hence
it may be used as monotherapy as a diuretic may not be required. The usual dose is 160-480mg/day given
as divided doses, however a sustained-release preparation may allow once-daily
dosing.
Diltiazem is also effective in the management of essential
hypertension, in moderate doses
(up to 360mg/day) it is about as effective as a thiazide diuretic, in higher
doses it is equivalent to verapamil and may produce less constipation. Nifedipine
capsules are less useful as chronic therapy as they need to be given 8th hourly
and §-blockers may be needed to block the reflex tachycardia that may
occur. However, tachycardia is not
such a problem with sustained-release nifedipine and it permits bd. dosing.
ARRHYTHMIAS
Both verapamil and diltiazem produce slowing of the ventricular
response to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias through their depressant effects
on A-V node function. In
arrhythmias due to A-V nodal re-entry circuits (paroxysmal SVT), verapamil
75-150µg/kg iv. is 90% effective in producing sinus rhythm within 5
minutes.
Verapamil will also slow the ventricular response to atrial flutter and
fibrillation (AF) although conversion to sinus rhythm is uncommon. Acute AF responds much more rapidly to
verapamil or esmolol (2-5 minutes) than to digoxin (onset 20-30 minutes, peak
effect in 90 minutes).
Verapamil and diltiazem are also useful in the chronic management of
atrial fibrillation, there is a large individual variation in the dose-response
and the dosage is titrated accordingly.
Verapamil is more effective than digoxin in maintaining ventricular rate
control in chronic AF during stress.
Patients with accessory pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) may
have tachycardias effectively treated with verapamil if anterograde conduction
occurs through the AV node (narrow QRS complex). When anterograde conduction is through the accessory pathway
(wide QRS complex), verapamil, along with digoxin, may worsen the tachycardia.
Diltiazem has been shown to be an effective prophylactic agent in the
prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after pneumonectomy. Digoxin may be
no better than placebo in this setting.
The calcium antagonists are not
effective in the management of ventricular arrhythmias. Verapamil has precipitated cardiovascular
collapse and VF when used in the management of VT and it is contraindicated.
MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA
Most episodes of myocardial ischaemia are silent and of these, most are
related not to an increase in myocardial oxygen demand, but rather to a
decrease in myocardial oxygen supply due to intermittent coronary
vasoconstriction or spasm.
Calcium blockers decrease myocardial oxygen demand by producing
myocardial depression and aside from nimodipine, their effect on coronary blood
flow is not pronounced. The most
important effect of the calcium blockers on myocardial ischaemia may be the
prevention of sympathetically mediated coronary vasoconstriction and spasm,
this is a significantly different mechanism of action from the §-blockers which
decrease MVO2.
Calciumchannel blockers are as effective as §-blochers as monotherapy in
the management of stable angina as monotherapy although they are less well
tolerated long term. However they are normally given in combination with a
nitrate or §-blocker for additional effect. Particularly effective combinations
include dihydropyridines and §-blockers or diltiazem / verapamil and a nitrate.
All of the calcium blockers are effective at reversing coronary spasm,
reducing ischaemic episodes and reducing GTN consumption in variant
(Prinzmetal) angina.
Unstable angina may involve coronary vasospasm, accelerated
atherosclerotic processes or enhanced platelet aggregation. The calcium channel blockers are as
effective as §-blockers in the relief of symptoms from unstable angina, but not
as monotherapy.
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Calcium channel blockers do not compare favourably with §-blockers in
reducing infarct size or mortality in the acute or chronic stages after
myocardial infarction.
MYOCARDIAL PROTECTION
Myocardial dysfunction occurs after ischaemic myocardium is reperfused
and is called ÔÒstunned myocardium.Ó The mechanisms involved in generating
stunned myocardium and reperfusion injury are various, but the common
associated factor is intracellular calcium overload.
There is much interest currently on the efficacy of calcium blockers as
cardioplegic agents in reducing reperfusion ventricular dysfunction, however to date the results from animal
experiments are not encouraging.
Calcium blockers have been shown to be cardioprotective for normal
hearts, but of no benefit in
failing hearts.
HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
Verapamil improves the exercise capacity and symptoms of patients with
obstructive cardiomyopathies by reducing outflow tract obstruction. This may be brought about by improving
diastolic function rather than by reducing the hypercontractile state. Verapamil produces improved diastolic
relaxation and ventricular filling.
Verapamil will also produce a reduction in ventricular muscle mass over
time.
CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE
The afterload-reducing effects of all the dihydropyridines improve the
symptoms of CHF, their vasodilator effects offset their negative inotropic
effects to produce improved forward flow.
CEREBRAL VASOSPASM AND ISCHAEMIA
Nimodipine and nicardipine are the only calcium blockers in clinical
use that are lipid soluble and capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier,
where they preferentially dilate cerebral vessels. Nimodipine has been shown to slightly reduce neurological
deficits in patients with proven cerebral vasospasm occurring after
subarachnoid haemorrhage compared with placebo. None of the calcium channel blockers is useful for ischaemic
stroke.
Nimodipine is useful in the prophylaxis of migraine syndromes.
In common with all direct-acting cerebral vasodilators, calcium
antagonists will produce an increase in intracranial pressure, which may limit
their usefulness in patients with severe intracranial hypertension.
Significant Adverse Effects
Verapamil increases digoxin levels (by reducing clearance), whereas
diltiazem has variable effects and nifedipine no effect on digoxin levels. Cimetidine, ranitidine, ketaconozole
and advanced age increase the serum levels of the calcium blockers, possibly by
reducing hepatic blood flow.
Pharmacodynamic drug interactions may occur: intravenous (but not oral)
use of verapamil and §-blockers may produce asystole, this oral combination
should also be avoided in the presence impaired LV function.
As may be predicted from their actions, the calcium antagonists may
produce hypotension, CHF, bradycardia, AV block and asystole. These effects are more likely to occur
when they are combined with §-blockers or digoxin, or in the presence of
hypokalaemia.
In a recent study on the perioperative use of nimodipine in cardiac
valve replacement, nimodipine was found to have no effect on neurological
outcome and the study was terminated when nimodipine was found to be associated
with an increase in death rate due to major bleeding.
There have been case reports of myocardial ischaemia and infarction
after acute withdrawal of verapamil or diltiazem similar to §-blocker
withdrawal.
Overdose of calcium channel blockers commonly presents as
hypotension and varying degrees of
heart block. Treatment is with gastric lavage with activated charcoal, fluids
and iv. calcium administration. Inotropes such as noradrenaline or amrinine may
be necessary.
References
1. Vasoactive Drugs.
BailliereÕs Clinical Anesthesiology; Volume 8, Number 1, March 1994
pp87-108, 137-147
2. Cardiac Anaesthesia Third Edition. Ed. Joel Kaplan, W.B. Saunders 1993
3. Drugs and Anaesthesia. Second Edition, Wood and Wood. Williams and Wilkins 1990
4. Therapy
of angina pectoris with long acting nitrates:which agent and when? Abrams J, Can. J. Cardiol..
1996 May; 12 Suppl C: 9C-16C
5. Potential
problems with intermittent nitrate therapy. Parker JD Can.
J. Cardiol. 1996 May: 12 suppl C: 22-24
6. Prevention
of tolerance to haemodynamic effects of nitrates with concomitant use of
hydralazine in patients with chronic heart failure. Gogia H et. al.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995
Dec: 26(7) 1575-80
7. Nimodipine
neuroprotection in cardiac valve patients: report of an early terminated
trial. Legault C et al. Stroke 1996 Apr; 27(4): 593-8
8. Treatment
modalities for hypertensive patients with intracranial pathology: options and risks. Tietjen C et al. Crit. Care Med. 1996 Feb: 24 (2): 311-22
9. Resistance
of the failing dystrophic hamster heart to the cardioprotective effects of
diltiazem and clentiazem: evidence
of coronary vascular dysfunctions.
Tanguay M et al. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1995 Aug; 73(8):
1108-17
10. Is
there a role for digoxin in patients with systolic dysfunction? Williamson K. Pharmacotherapy.
1996 Mar-Apr; 16(2 Pt 2):
37S-42S
11. A
pilot study to investigate the pulmonary effects of digoxin in patients with
asthma. Ayson M et al. NZ Med. J. 1996 Feb 9;
109(1015): 36-7
12. Digoxin
and mortality in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: observations in patients at low and
intermediate risk. Leor J et al. Cardovasc. Drug Ther. 1995 Aug; 9(4): 609-17
13. Intravenous
digoxin in acute atrial fibrillation. Results of a randomised, placebo
controlled multiicentre trial in 239 patients. The Digitalis in Acute Atrial Fibrillation Group. Eur. Heart J. 1997 Apr; 18(4): 649-54
14. Effects
of diltiazem versus digoxin on dysrhythmias and cardiac function after
pneumonectomy. Amar et al. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997 May; 63(5): 1374-81
15.
Dilemmas in
the acute pharmacological treatment of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation. Elam et al. Am. J. Emerg. Med.1997 Jul;
15(4): 418-9
16.
Calcium antagonist
drugs. Abernethy D, Schwartz J. NEMJ. 1999 Nov. 341 (19) 1447-53
17.
Metanalysis
of trials comparing §-blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates for stable
angina. Heidenreich P et al. JAMA, May 26, 1999, 281 (20) 1927